[PATCH 3 of 5] run-tests: do not fail when the path sep does not match on windows
mpm at selenic.com
Wed Jul 17 17:52:11 CDT 2013
On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 17:09 -0500, Kevin Bullock wrote:
> On 17 Jul 2013, at 3:46 PM, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > On Sun, 2013-07-14 at 00:25 +0200, Simon Heimberg wrote:
> >> # HG changeset patch
> >> # User Simon Heimberg <simohe at besonet.ch>
> >> # Date 1373752948 -7200
> >> # Node ID d9fa7503933a2491fc1bb0d2f5c921655d8f9f37
> >> # Parent 9baf643dca269dde0791972e6f4f092b1913ee2d
> >> run-tests: do not fail when the path sep does not match on windows
> > Why? Are we giving up?
> I understood this to mean "print a warning, but don't bail out on the rest of the test"?
Are we going soft on crime? Why are we making something that is supposed
to be a failure a warning? Why is less strict forward progress?
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
More information about the Mercurial-devel