Making "hg push -r foo" changes phases
pierre-yves.david at logilab.fr
Thu Jun 13 09:43:45 CDT 2013
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:34:27AM -0400, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> Would it make sense that when doing "hg push -r foo" that foo become a
> draft or public phase if it was originally secret?
> I find it odd that hg push -r foo won't push foo, even if I just
> explicitly requested it, just because foo is secret.
Foo may be a lot of things, a branch name, a bookmark, a revset or an explicite hash.
Making the distinction between those case is non trivial and maybe a bad idea.
I'm not sure to be able to define a proper definition for "explicitly requested".
Is this special case special enough?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the Mercurial-devel