v2+ suggestions

Didly didlybom at gmail.com
Tue Mar 12 06:38:49 CDT 2013


On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Miroslav Zivkovic
<miroslav.zivkovic.ali at gmail.com> wrote:
> As I see it, version #1 was excellent, but then someone decided to blow it
> up.
> Working with simple commands like outgoing, incoming, push ... is a
> nightmare in version 2+. It's like a cell phone designed for photos and surf
> but not for calls and sms. So please,
> - Get rid of URL in "boxes" - it's killing flexibility.
> - URL must always be there - "mode" in which I cannot do HG commands is a
> missing the point of program's purpose.
>
> In hope these suggestions will reach someone's mind,
> All the best.

HI Miroslav,

I suspect that you are talking about TortoiseHg rather than the
command line mercurial tool? The TortoiseHg and mercurial projects are
related but independent so this is not the right forum for your
comments/requests.

If so please resend this message to the TortoiseHg mailing list
(thg-dev at googlegroups.com).

I would also help if you changed the tone of your email. We welcome
constructive criticism, which works best if it is as specific as
possible. What exatly don't you like? What can we do to help your
workflow? Your cell phone analogy does not really help us understand
your problem!

Also be adviced that if you do not like TortoiseHg v2.x you can still
use v1.x. The code is available so you can improve it if you want, and
there is a fork that is maintained and can be used with newer
mercurial versions.

Cheers,

Angel


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list