[PATCH 2 of 4 V2] copies: refactor checkcopies() into a top level method

Durham Goode durham at fb.com
Tue May 7 11:56:04 CDT 2013


On 5/7/13 8:25 AM, "Augie Fackler" <raf at durin42.com> wrote:

>On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 08:14:48PM -0700, Durham Goode wrote:
>>
>> For
>> example, I'm developing a filelog replacement that doesn't have rev
>>numbers
>> so all the rev number dependent implementation here needs to be replaced
>> by the extension.
>
>Ooh. That posted anyplace I can follow along? That's relevant to my
>interests.
>

There's nothing posted publicly yet. Once it's in a mildly reviewable
state (next week maybe?) I'll send out an email here with some details.
It'll be hosted on bitbucket, so hopefully I can make the repo public.

The general goal is to get all of our file contents off our client
machines and into a memcache like service. Then we only pull down the
files that are needed during an update. So we have a revlog implementation
that acts more like a key/value store than a revlog and fetches the values
from a remote server as needed.



More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list