[PATCH 0 of 3 STABLE] bundlerepo: make secret revisions visible, if bundle bases on current local repo

Pierre-Yves David pierre-yves.david at logilab.fr
Tue May 28 11:20:11 CDT 2013

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:59:32AM -0400, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> On 28 May 2013 11:02, FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy at lares.dti.ne.jp> wrote:
> > This patch series focuses on the inconsistency between "hg incoming"
> > and "hg unbundle": "hg incoming" doesn't show the revisions in the
> > bundle, even though they are restored by "hg unbundle", if they are
> > descendant of secret ones in local repository.
> I think this difference makes sense. I normally pull from bundles, not
> use unbundle. If hg incoming doesn't show secret revisions but hg pull
> gives me those extra revisions, I would be confused.

Can you convince me it make more sense to hide them in other case ?

> Perhaps instead make unbundle warn about secret changesets being
> imported? Or give a --secret option to incoming?

Pierre-Yves David


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20130528/f50bef60/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list