[PATCH 3 of 5] shelve: use an --unshelve parameter instead of a command

David Soria Parra dsp at experimentalworks.net
Wed Sep 18 23:29:45 CDT 2013


On 09/17/2013 11:21 PM, Martin Geisler wrote:
> This doesn't look as clean as 'hg unshelve --continue' to me. There are
> now two flags to shelve, both of which selects a major mode of
> operation. It seems simpler to me to tell the user: you executed 'hg
> unshelve' and it broke, now fix the mess and run 'hg unshelve --cont' to
> continue.

I used an parameter --unshelve instead of a command due to the previous
discussion on the extension. I personally don't have a preference, but
it was suggested that we don't use an "unshelve" command. This way all
the parameters are defined on the same command. Would you prefer
"--apply" maybe?

Matt and rest: Any suggestions on the UI bits?


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list