[PATCH] merge: let the user choose to merge, keep local or keep remote subrepo revisions

Angel Ezquerra angel.ezquerra at gmail.com
Wed Sep 25 01:20:24 CDT 2013


On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 6:00 AM, Kevin Bullock
<kbullock+mercurial at ringworld.org> wrote:
> On 7 Sep 2013, at 12:09 AM, Angel Ezquerra wrote:
>
>> # HG changeset patch
>> # User Angel Ezquerra <angel.ezquerra at gmail.com>
>> # Date 1378420708 -7200
>> #      Fri Sep 06 00:38:28 2013 +0200
>> # Node ID 15548e5b1c00bd2f261e3c81d39f2465263bc3c3
>> # Parent  1d07bf106c2ad1c7ef5e257e754ca8d858bd04b0
>> merge: let the user choose to merge, keep local or keep remote subrepo revisions
>
> Fails tests:

Sorry about that. I did not have git nor svn installed on my machine.
I installed them, re ran the tests and fixed them. I'll send an
updated patch in a minute.

BTW, in the last "note" on the commit message I said:

"I don't know of a way to test the "keep local" and "keep remote" options (i.e.
to force the test to choose those options)."

Is that a problem? I tested it manually and it does work fine, but I'd
rather have an automated test. The problem is that I don't know of a
way to tell run-tests to answer "l" or "r" to the prompt that asks
which subrepo revision to use?

Cheers,

Angel


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list