[PATCH 4 of 8 V3] subrepo: store the ui object in the base class

Martin von Zweigbergk martinvonz at google.com
Fri Dec 12 11:59:21 CST 2014


On Thu Dec 11 2014 at 7:36:10 PM Matt Harbison <mharbison72 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> # HG changeset patch
> # User Matt Harbison <matt_harbison at yahoo.com>
> # Date 1417036418 18000
> #      Wed Nov 26 16:13:38 2014 -0500
> # Node ID 71bacffdfe45b9b262e8a3c7260375e1b0f0b29c
> # Parent  da5bde55b5296f0cce6dd7582c0c5d1edb323ec8
> subrepo: store the ui object in the base class
>
> This will be used in the next patch to print a warning from the base
> class.  It
> seems better than having to explicitly pass it to a new method, since a
> lot of
> existing methods also require it.
>

Is it worth updating those existing methods?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20141212/ef74fc47/attachment.html>


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list