Proposing compact graph log
Greg Ward
greg at gerg.ca
Mon Jun 2 18:10:05 CDT 2014
On 03 June 2014, Santiago Payà i Miralta said:
> Hello,
>
> Many thanks for your replies and guidance. If I not misunderstood I would
> have to:
>
> * Open an entry in bugzilla (feature) explaining in detail the intentions
> of this contribution.
No need for a Bugzilla entry. In fact, that's probably the worst place
to propose a new feature. This mailing list right here is the best
place to propose and discuss new features. It's where you'll get the
most informed audience and best feedback.
> * Trying to write a patch that does not break the backwards compatibility
> nor tests. With an option to the log command or with a config flag in hgrc.
Treating templates without \n more consistently would be nice. I'm not
sure how to do it sanely though. If you can figure it out, great!
Also, I agree that backwards compatibility is probably not a huge
concern here. Anyone parsing "log -G" output is doing it wrong. Very,
very wrong. ;-)
Greg
--
Greg Ward http://www.gerg.ca
<greg at gerg.ca> @gergdotca
More information about the Mercurial-devel
mailing list