[PATCH] template: add a ``troubles`` keyword

[Angel Ezquerra]

On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Simon King <simon at simonking.org.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Angel Ezquerra
> <angel.ezquerra at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> El 19/06/2014 11:29, "Pierre-Yves David" <pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org>
>> escribió:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/19/2014 02:28 AM, Angel Ezquerra wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> El 19/06/2014 10:52, "Pierre-Yves David" <pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org
>>>> <mailto:pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org>> escribió:
>>>>
>>>>  >
>>>>  >
>>>>  >
>>>>  > On 06/18/2014 01:01 PM, timeless at gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:timeless at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >> I wrote:
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >>  > Technically, from an English perspective, "troubled" would
>>>> probably
>>>>  >> be better.
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >> Pierre-Yves wrote:
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >>  > ? "All the troubled affecting a changesets" ?
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >> All the troubled changesets.
>>>>  >
>>>>  >
>>>>  > Which is not a proper documentations of the '{troubles}' template.
>>>>  >
>>>>  >
>>>>  > "All troubles affecting a changeset" ≠ "All troubled changesets"
>>>>
>>>> Would the correct documentation be "All troubled changesets affecting a
>>>> changeset"?
>>>
>>> no…
>>
>> Ummm, what is a "trouble" then, if not a troubled changeset?
>>
>> Angel
>>
>
> "{troubles}" is the list of *reasons why* the changeset is "troubled"
> (ie. unstable, divergent or bumped)
>
> Simon

I see. Thanks for the clarification.

Angel