[PATCH 1 of 3 stable v2] discovery: test coverage for 3ef893520a85 issues

Mads Kiilerich mads at kiilerich.com
Wed Nov 5 11:38:12 CST 2014


# HG changeset patch
# User Mads Kiilerich <madski at unity3d.com>
# Date 1415208017 -3600
#      Wed Nov 05 18:20:17 2014 +0100
# Branch stable
# Node ID e0d9986516e06dc2b9cd8288c461d434b8a5f8dd
# Parent  a3c2d92112948b2fa1ac3881920ac4d932cda6c8
discovery: test coverage for 3ef893520a85 issues

diff --git a/tests/test-setdiscovery.t b/tests/test-setdiscovery.t
--- a/tests/test-setdiscovery.t
+++ b/tests/test-setdiscovery.t
@@ -357,3 +357,42 @@ Test actual protocol when pulling one ne
   $ cat errors.log
 
   $ cd ..
+
+
+Issue 4438 - test coverage for 3ef893520a85 issues.
+
+  $ mkdir 3ef893520a85
+  $ cd 3ef893520a85
+  $ hg init t0
+  $ for i in `seq 101`; do hg -R t0 up -qr null; hg -R t0 branch -q b$i; hg -R t0 ci -qmb$i; done
+  $ hg clone -q t0 t1
+  $ for i in `seq 101`; do hg -R t0 up -qr null; hg -R t0 branch -q c$i; hg -R t0 ci -qmc$i; done
+  $ hg -R t1 branch -q o2 && hg -R t1 ci -qmo2
+
+Set iteration order can cause wrong and unstable results:
+
+  $ hg -R t0 outgoing t1 -T'{rev} '
+  comparing with t1
+  searching for changes
+  * (glob)
+
+Full initialsamplesize of samples is already common:
+
+  $ cat >> $TESTTMP/unrandomsample.py << EOF
+  > import random
+  > def sample(population, k):
+  >     return sorted(population)[:k]
+  > random.sample = sample
+  > EOF
+
+  $ cat >> t0/.hg/hgrc << EOF
+  > [extensions]
+  > unrandomsample = $TESTTMP/unrandomsample.py
+  > EOF
+
+  $ hg -R t0 outgoing t1 -T'{rev} '
+  comparing with t1
+  searching for changes
+  no changes found
+  [1]
+  $ cd ..


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list