[PATCH 1 of 3 stable v2] discovery: test coverage for 3ef893520a85 issues

[Matt Mackall]

On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 18:38 +0100, Mads Kiilerich wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Mads Kiilerich <madski at unity3d.com>
> # Date 1415208017 -3600
> #      Wed Nov 05 18:20:17 2014 +0100
> # Branch stable
> # Node ID e0d9986516e06dc2b9cd8288c461d434b8a5f8dd
> # Parent  a3c2d92112948b2fa1ac3881920ac4d932cda6c8
> discovery: test coverage for 3ef893520a85 issues
> 
> diff --git a/tests/test-setdiscovery.t b/tests/test-setdiscovery.t
> --- a/tests/test-setdiscovery.t
> +++ b/tests/test-setdiscovery.t
> @@ -357,3 +357,42 @@ Test actual protocol when pulling one ne
>    $ cat errors.log
>  
>    $ cd ..
> +
> +
> +Issue 4438 - test coverage for 3ef893520a85 issues.
> +
> +  $ mkdir 3ef893520a85
> +  $ cd 3ef893520a85
> +  $ hg init t0
> +  $ for i in `seq 101`; do hg -R t0 up -qr null; hg -R t0 branch -q b$i; hg -R t0 ci -qmb$i; done
> +  $ hg clone -q t0 t1
> +  $ for i in `seq 101`; do hg -R t0 up -qr null; hg -R t0 branch -q c$i; hg -R t0 ci -qmc$i; done
> +  $ hg -R t1 branch -q o2 && hg -R t1 ci -qmo2

You're a few minutes late, as v1 is already published.

It's great that you've got a test for this, but I'm more than a little
worried about how much this test case costs. Candidate for being stored
as a pre-built bundle, perhaps?

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.