[PATCH RFC] reflog: adds a reflog extension

Mike Hommey mh at glandium.org
Thu Oct 2 00:28:15 CDT 2014


On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 10:16:20PM -0700, Durham Goode wrote:
> 
> On 10/1/14, 7:56 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> >On 10/1/14 6:45 PM, Durham Goode wrote:
> >># HG changeset patch
> >># User Durham Goode <durham at fb.com>
> >># Date 1412200597 25200
> >>#      Wed Oct 01 14:56:37 2014 -0700
> >># Node ID 942be96848993cf7ab5ed529db9c1f39c6d43c30
> >># Parent  939ce500c92a3dcc0e10815242361ff70a6fcae9
> >>reflog: adds a reflog extension
> >Very nice!
> >
> >Do you think it's worth adding "local/working" terminology to help
> >distinguish it from the inevitable support for "remote reflogs" or "store
> >reflogs?"
> I'm not sure I understand what "remote reflogs" and "store reflogs" are?
> Could you provide examples?

He is talking about pushlog, which is some kind of reflog. And he would
like to make them pullable. ("what changesets are push heads" is a
valuable information)

Mike


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list