[PATCH V2] graft: record the user who performed the command in the extras dictionary

Siddharth Agarwal sid at less-broken.com
Fri Apr 10 22:30:17 CDT 2015


On 04/10/2015 07:50 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
>
> I like the intent of this patch but I'm not a fan of "graft-user." I
> think answering "who was the last person to 'touch' this commit" is
> useful beyond graft and I could see us doing something similar for
> other history editing commands (e.g. rebase).
>
> Thinking ahead to when we want this metadata exposed to users (think a
> template keyword), I'd rather we have a single entity, not N, to
> represent "last touched by user." "last-user?"

Since we appear to be dancing around the obvious suggestion:

"committer"?

/me runs away


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list