[PATCH V2] graft: record the user who performed the command in the extras dictionary

[Augie Fackler]

On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 08:30:17PM -0700, Siddharth Agarwal wrote:
> On 04/10/2015 07:50 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> >
> > I like the intent of this patch but I'm not a fan of "graft-user." I
> > think answering "who was the last person to 'touch' this commit" is
> > useful beyond graft and I could see us doing something similar for
> > other history editing commands (e.g. rebase).
> >
> > Thinking ahead to when we want this metadata exposed to users (think a
> > template keyword), I'd rather we have a single entity, not N, to
> > represent "last touched by user." "last-user?"
>
> Since we appear to be dancing around the obvious suggestion:
>
> "committer"?
>
> /me runs away

I think you're joking, but I was actually going to suggest just that.

> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial-devel mailing list
> Mercurial-devel at selenic.com
> http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel