[PATCH V2] graft: record the user who performed the command in the extras dictionary

[Matt Harbison]

On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 17:22:16 -0400, Augie Fackler <raf at durin42.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 08:30:17PM -0700, Siddharth Agarwal wrote:
>> On 04/10/2015 07:50 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
>> >
>> > I like the intent of this patch but I'm not a fan of "graft-user." I
>> > think answering "who was the last person to 'touch' this commit" is
>> > useful beyond graft and I could see us doing something similar for
>> > other history editing commands (e.g. rebase).
>> >
>> > Thinking ahead to when we want this metadata exposed to users (think a
>> > template keyword), I'd rather we have a single entity, not N, to
>> > represent "last touched by user." "last-user?"
>>
>> Since we appear to be dancing around the obvious suggestion:
>>
>> "committer"?
>>
>> /me runs away
>
> I think you're joking, but I was actually going to suggest just that.

I like it too.  The joke part makes me think I should wait for mpm to  
approve?