[PATCH V2] graft: record the user who performed the command in the extras dictionary

[Alexander Drozdov]

On 11.04.2015 06:30:17 +0300 Siddharth Agarwal wrote:
> On 04/10/2015 07:50 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
>> I like the intent of this patch but I'm not a fan of "graft-user." I
>> think answering "who was the last person to 'touch' this commit" is
>> useful beyond graft and I could see us doing something similar for
>> other history editing commands (e.g. rebase).
>>
>> Thinking ahead to when we want this metadata exposed to users (think a
>> template keyword), I'd rather we have a single entity, not N, to
>> represent "last touched by user." "last-user?"
> Since we appear to be dancing around the obvious suggestion:
>
> "committer"?
I'm already using "committer" (see https://bitbucket.org/ede/committer extension)
>
> /me runs away
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial-devel mailing list
> Mercurial-devel at selenic.com
> http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel