Bundle2 last call

[Pierre-Yves David]

On 02/05/2015 12:23 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> I thought marmoute said he was going to change the framing so individual
> parts were limited in size? I /think/ that would require an explicit
> wire protocol bump?

Then marmoute's got ambushed by a herd of other stuff. and decided it 
was time to push bundle2 out of the gate before march (In vacation next 
week)


I think we can work on the implementation side to prevent huge frame 
attack. (Needs some closer look for the part header section).

> As someone who wrote a lot of words about bundle2, I still think there
> are issues worth addressing. But perfect is the enemy of done. I
> desperately want to roll out bundle2 at Mozilla and we can't do that
> until we have stronger guarantees about BC since we don't control all
> the system deployments as tightly as others. If any of my concerns turn
> into real problems, well, there is always bundle3.

I'll be happy to review patch that address some of the discussed point 
in the next 48h. But I think we should not delay bundle2 in the name of 
perfection. (and we seems to agree there).

> You don't need it, but you have my blessing to do bundle2 as-is if
> that's the plan.

I do not need it, but I'm sincerely glad to have it :)

-- 
Pierre-Yves David