hg rebase killed branch name?

[Augie Fackler]

On Jan 11, 2015, at 7:04 AM, anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I rebased changes in my named branch and now see that changesets don't
> belong to that branch anymore. I though that rebase is for moving
> branches relative to the tree, not to move changesets to a different
> branch.
> 
> Is it a bug? If yes, then why --keepbranches is here?

As you’ve surmised, what you’ve experienced is the expected behavior, and what you wanted is what you’d get with --keepbranches.

> 
> Please, CC.
> -- 
> anatoly t.
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial-devel mailing list
> Mercurial-devel at selenic.com
> http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20150111/613c939d/attachment.pgp>