[PATCH 4 of 5 remotefilelog-http] remotefilelog: introduce new getfile method
Augie Fackler
raf at durin42.com
Thu Jul 16 15:07:14 CDT 2015
> On Jul 16, 2015, at 2:23 PM, Durham Goode <durham at fb.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/16/15, 11:14 AM, "Augie Fackler" <raf at durin42.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>> On Jul 16, 2015, at 1:36 PM, Durham Goode <durham at fb.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/16/15, 8:36 AM, "raf at durin42.com" <raf at durin42.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> # HG changeset patch
>>>> # User Augie Fackler <augie at google.com>
>>>> # Date 1435699951 14400
>>>> # Tue Jun 30 17:32:31 2015 -0400
>>>> # Node ID ea8c6483a58df0eb0c296abc17cc846be80ed8cb
>>>> # Parent 0080461e46716fa9732df990232f968ea3eb6d28
>>>> remotefilelog: introduce new getfile method
>>>>
>>>> Right now, this is a naive fetch-one-file method. The next change will
>>>> mark the method as batchable and use a batch in the client so that
>>>> many files can be requested in a single RPC.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/remotefilelog/remotefilelogserver.py
>>>> b/remotefilelog/remotefilelogserver.py
>>>> --- a/remotefilelog/remotefilelogserver.py
>>>> +++ b/remotefilelog/remotefilelogserver.py
>>>> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ def onetimesetup(ui):
>>>>
>>>> # support file content requests
>>>> wireproto.commands['getfiles'] = (getfiles, '')
>>>> + wireproto.commands['getfile'] = (getfile, 'file node')
>>>>
>>>> class streamstate(object):
>>>> match = None
>>>> @@ -155,9 +156,11 @@ def onetimesetup(ui):
>>>> def _capabilities(orig, repo, proto):
>>>> caps = orig(repo, proto)
>>>> if ((shallowrepo.requirement in repo.requirements or
>>>> - ui.configbool('remotefilelog', 'server'))
>>>> - and isinstance(proto, sshserver.sshserver)):
>>>> - caps.append(shallowrepo.requirement)
>>>> + ui.configbool('remotefilelog', 'server'))):
>>>> + if isinstance(proto, sshserver.sshserver):
>>>> + # legacy getfiles method which only works over ssh
>>>> + caps.append(shallowrepo.requirement)
>>>> + caps.append("getfile")
>>>
>>> By always appending the getfile capability, won't this force even ssh
>>> connections to use the new behavior? If that's intentional, do we have
>>> numbers on how that affects perf?
>>
>> I think (though I didn¹t recheck just now) that the remotefilelog
>> codepath in the client is still preferred. We could certainly make it
>> that way.
>
> A few lines up in this patch it has:
>
> + if remote.capable("getfile"):
> + _getfilesbatch(...
> + else:
>
> + ...
> + _getfiles(
>
> Which made me think it prefers getfile over getfiles. If we reverse this,
> I can take this patch without worrying about perf (and I can test the perf
> later).
That works for me. Please feel encouraged to just make that change.
(if you’d rather I make the change, let me know and I can take care of it eventually)
>
>>
>> I don¹t have a good way to get performance numbers for this code - heck,
>> I only just started hacking on it. In *theory*, the request batching
>> should do something reasonable to keep performance from being awful. If
>> that¹s not happening in hg, we should fix request batching for ssh IMO.
>
> My normal test is to take a large repo (mozilla central might work), mark
> it as a remotefilelog server, then just do a 'time hg prefetch -r tip'
> from a client with an empty cache. This first time will be slow (since it
> builds the blobs), but the second time will be accurate.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20150716/31d6655d/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Mercurial-devel
mailing list