Mercurial failing on TLSv1.2 repos, but I wrote a patch
mpm at selenic.com
Mon Jul 20 16:33:20 CDT 2015
On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 21:01 +0000, Warren Melnick wrote:
> I am using 2.6. It hits that line which says TLSv1 (line 55, as
> highlighted in your example). TLSv1 is NOT TLSv1.x, it is TLSv1.0
> only. The only one that gives the choice of TLS is SSLv23, it is just
> very poorly named. See the chart here:
That was indeed the gist of my first message?
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
More information about the Mercurial-devel