[PATCH evolve-ext] fold: add argument to handle ambiguous case
pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org
Tue Jun 9 15:22:00 CDT 2015
On 06/09/2015 01:20 PM, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 12:58 -0700, Pierre-Yves David wrote:
>> On 06/08/2015 05:08 PM, Pierre-Yves David wrote:
>>> I would be pretty unhappy to expose random user to X::Y recommendation
>>> because they will screw it up a X:Y and get burned down. So the idea of
>>> X+. is also interesting (but won't work for a full stack).
> Do we allow folding non-linearly-related changesets?
This is unsupported yet (because this requires in memory rebasing, that
we do not support yet).
I think we will want a way to support such folding (the same as we
support non linear set in rebase).
More information about the Mercurial-devel