mercurial/crew at 26290: 45 outgoing changesets
pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org
Tue Jun 16 00:57:36 CDT 2015
On 06/14/2015 05:34 AM, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 13:01:10 +0200, Mercurial Commits wrote:
>> changeset: 26278:01fbbf09eb23
>> user: Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david at fb.com>
>> date: Thu Jun 11 14:21:21 2015 -0700
>> summary: revset: mark the place where we are combining sets in the wrong direction
> Does it mean fullreposet should be order-neutral, have no defined order?
Actually no, good spot, the ordering here make some senese. I think this
is highlighting the fact we wants two differents objects, one to
bootstrap de revset process and one to be used in stuff like 'all()'.
In the mean time this code is useful to enforce ordering to all the
other revset that should take care of it and do not.
More information about the Mercurial-devel