record and crecord: proposal to merge into core

Augie Fackler raf at durin42.com
Wed Mar 11 07:59:35 CDT 2015


On Mar 11, 2015, at 3:49 AM, Ryan McElroy <rm at fb.com> wrote:

>> This is essentially "hg histedit" with the "edit" action on 1 changeset. Perhaps we could implement "hg split" in terms of a histedit recipe? Maybe we should be moving histedit's "action processing" into core as well? I know I've wanted to do things in extensions like rewrite commit messages in a changeset in the middle of the stack. It's quite tedious. </scope bloat>
> 
> I love these ideas; lets keep crecord's refactor on track though :-). We've also been tossing around some big refactor ideas for histedit; I think a "split" action would fit well with those plans.

FWIW, you can already do splits with histedit using 'edit' and then doing record in the working copy.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20150311/e7db888a/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20150311/e7db888a/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list