[PATCH 3 of 4] revlog: raise an exception earlier if an entry is too large
adrian at cadifra.com
Fri May 22 15:00:44 CDT 2015
On 2015-05-22 19:40, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 12:05 -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
>> On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 16:30 -0400, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
>>> # HG changeset patch
>>> # User Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <jordigh at octave.org>
>>> # Date 1432239712 14400
>>> # Thu May 21 16:21:52 2015 -0400
>>> # Node ID 94b79351d9569b65c3c111cbfe88a03112d617a9
>>> # Parent 88b99c48761cc7b982b84294aa679b63f5edf967
>>> revlog: raise an exception earlier if an entry is too large
>> Issue number?
> I considered the 4th patch in this series to address the issue, but I
> suppose this one does too. Is it ok to have two patches with the same
> issue number?
I'd say yes. Splitting of patches should not be dictated by issue
fixing. If it makes sense to have multiple patches by the usual rules,
Precedent: I've done that (two patches with the same issue number) in
e1002cf9fe54 and e98581d44f0b, fixing
This was in 2010 and "HG Bot" was able to handle it.
More information about the Mercurial-devel