[PATCH v2] histedit: use one editor when multiple folds happen in a row (issue3524) (BC)

Durham Goode durham at fb.com
Tue Sep 1 12:23:34 CDT 2015


I agree, it's a little beyond what we need, but given histedit's 
history, I think it'd be worth doing.

It might also enable other interesting things from extensions.  For 
instance, if we wanted to remove the need to specify 'drop' lines, we 
could have the drop action class preprocess the list to add 'drop' 
entries when the user has deleted lines.  Or if we wanted to add a 
'review' action, the action could be implemented as a preprocessor that 
replaces 'review' actions with 'exec run_my_review_tool'

On 9/1/15 10:17 AM, Augie Fackler wrote:
> Yeah, I can do that. Sounds a little overengineered for the current
> case, but I can see it being useful. I'll roll a v3 soon. Thanks!
>
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Durham Goode <durham at fb.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 8/31/15 9:56 PM, Augie Fackler wrote:
>>> # HG changeset patch
>>> # User Augie Fackler <augie at google.com>
>>> # Date 1440701186 14400
>>> #      Thu Aug 27 14:46:26 2015 -0400
>>> # Node ID 6d4eb98524de846543455102dfe4aaa3c8c8af45
>>> # Parent  049005de325ea400893f45bd6221215cc9b26db0
>>> histedit: use one editor when multiple folds happen in a row (issue3524)
>>> (BC)
>>>
>>> This was the first ever feature request for histedit, originally filed
>>> back on April 4, 2009. Finally fixed.
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hgext/histedit.py b/hgext/histedit.py
>>> --- a/hgext/histedit.py
>>> +++ b/hgext/histedit.py
>>> @@ -559,6 +559,9 @@ class fold(histeditaction):
>>>        def skipprompt(self):
>>>            return False
>>>    +    def mergedescs(self):
>>> +        return True
>>> +
>>>        def finishfold(self, ui, repo, ctx, oldctx, newnode,
>>> internalchanges):
>>>            parent = ctx.parents()[0].node()
>>>            hg.update(repo, parent)
>>> @@ -566,7 +569,7 @@ class fold(histeditaction):
>>>            commitopts = {}
>>>            commitopts['user'] = ctx.user()
>>>            # commit message
>>> -        if self.skipprompt():
>>> +        if not self.mergedescs():
>>>                newmessage = ctx.description()
>>>            else:
>>>                newmessage = '\n***\n'.join(
>>> @@ -601,7 +604,22 @@ class fold(histeditaction):
>>>                replacements.append((ich, (n,)))
>>>            return repo[n], replacements
>>>    +class _multifold(fold):
>>> +    """fold subclass used for when multiple folds happen in a row
>>> +
>>> +    We only want to fire the editor for the folded message once when
>>> +    (say) four CLs are folded down into a single change. This is
>>> +    similar to rollup, but we should preserve both messages so that
>>> +    when the last fold operation runs we can show the user all the
>>> +    commit messages in their editor.
>>> +    """
>>> +    def skipprompt(self):
>>> +        return True
>>> +
>>>    class rollup(fold):
>>> +    def mergedescs(self):
>>> +        return False
>>> +
>>>        def skipprompt(self):
>>>            return True
>>>    @@ -644,6 +662,7 @@ actiontable = {'p': pick,
>>>                   'edit': edit,
>>>                   'f': fold,
>>>                   'fold': fold,
>>> +               '_multifold': _multifold,
>>>                   'r': rollup,
>>>                   'roll': rollup,
>>>                   'd': drop,
>>> @@ -850,6 +869,14 @@ def _histedit(ui, repo, state, *freeargs
>>>                                            'histedit')
>>>            state.backupfile = backupfile
>>>    +    # preprocess rules so that we can hide inner folds from the user
>>> +    # and only show one editor
>>> +    rules = state.rules[:]
>>> +    for idx, ((action, ha), (nextact, unused)) in enumerate(
>>> +            zip(rules, rules[1:] + [(None, None)])):
>>> +        if action == 'fold' and nextact == 'fold':
>>> +            state.rules[idx] = '_multifold', ha
>> This is moving us a bit back towards the world where there are hard coded
>> special cases all over the place.  Can we add a preprocess() function to
>> each histeditaction class and put this logic inside the multifold class?
>> Then just call preprocess on every action class.
>>
>>> +
>>>        while state.rules:
>>>            state.write()
>>>            action, ha = state.rules.pop(0)
>>> @@ -995,7 +1022,7 @@ def verifyrules(rules, repo, ctxs):
>>>                raise util.Abort(_('duplicated command for changeset %s') %
>>>                        ha[:12])
>>>            seen.add(ha)
>>> -        if action not in actiontable:
>>> +        if action not in actiontable or action.startswith('_'):
>>>                raise util.Abort(_('unknown action "%s"') % action)
>>>            parsed.append([action, ha])
>>>        missing = sorted(expected - seen)  # sort to stabilize output
>>> diff --git a/tests/test-histedit-fold.t b/tests/test-histedit-fold.t
>>> --- a/tests/test-histedit-fold.t
>>> +++ b/tests/test-histedit-fold.t
>>> @@ -509,4 +509,44 @@ into the hook command.
>>>      $ hg add amended.txt
>>>      $ hg ci -q --config extensions.largefiles= --amend -I amended.txt
>>>    +  $ echo foo >> foo
>>> +  $ hg add foo
>>> +  $ hg ci -m foo1
>>> +  $ echo foo >> foo
>>> +  $ hg ci -m foo2
>>> +  $ echo foo >> foo
>>> +  $ hg ci -m foo3
>>> +  $ hg logt
>>> +  4:21679ff7675c foo3
>>> +  3:b7389cc4d66e foo2
>>> +  2:0e01aeef5fa8 foo1
>>> +  1:578c7455730c a
>>> +  0:79b99e9c8e49 b
>>> +  $ cat > $TESTTMP/editor.sh <<EOF
>>> +  > echo merged foos > $$1
>>> +  > echo ran editor >> $TESTTMP/editorlog.txt
>>> +  > EOF
>>> +  $ HGEDITOR="sh $TESTTMP/editor.sh" hg histedit 1 --commands - 2>&1
>>> <<EOF | fixbundle
>>> +  > pick 578c7455730c 1 a
>>> +  > pick 0e01aeef5fa8 2 foo1
>>> +  > fold b7389cc4d66e 3 foo2
>>> +  > fold 21679ff7675c 4 foo3
>>> +  > EOF
>>> +  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
>>> +  reverting foo
>>> +  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
>>> +  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
>>> +  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
>>> +  merging foo
>>> +  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
>>> +  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
>>> +  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
>>> +  $ hg logt
>>> +  2:f7c59a6ef880 foo1
>>> +  1:578c7455730c a
>>> +  0:79b99e9c8e49 b
>>> +Editor should have run only once
>>> +  $ cat $TESTTMP/editorlog.txt
>>> +  ran editor
>>> +
>>>      $ cd ..
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mercurial-devel mailing list
>>> Mercurial-devel at selenic.com
>>> https://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mercurial-devel mailing list
>> Mercurial-devel at selenic.com
>> https://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel



More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list