[PATCH 4 of 5 remotefilelog-ext debs] contrib: new rules for building a debian package of remotefilelog

[Augie Fackler]

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Augie Fackler <raf at durin42.com> wrote:
> + mercurial,

It occurs to me we probably shouldn't have a hard dep on mercurial,
and instead Mercurial should be in suggests or recommends. Strictly
speaking you /can/ install this deb without hg and it's "fine", and it
strikes me that that'll likely be the configuration I run with in the
long term (that is, hg self-installed, but remotefilelog coming from a
company-built package.) What do y'all think?