[PATCH 3 of 3] revset: add a changes(file, fromline, toline[, rev]) revset
yuya at tcha.org
Fri Dec 2 09:19:56 EST 2016
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 08:38:53 +0100, Denis Laxalde wrote:
> Yuya Nishihara a écrit :
> > On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:12:35 +0100, Denis Laxalde wrote:
> >> Denis Laxalde a écrit :
> >>> # HG changeset patch
> >>> # User Denis Laxalde <denis.laxalde at logilab.fr>
> >>> # Date 1480086890 -3600
> >>> # Fri Nov 25 16:14:50 2016 +0100
> >>> # Node ID e88a112076294d9b1639a486e7ef0ec9c1ffa660
> >>> # Parent 6dd93ae7b35002531308444c87dcf47beb773648
> >>> # EXP-Topic linerange-log/revset
> >>> revset: add a changes(file, fromline, toline[, rev]) revset
> >> This is the first step of my work (in progress) about adding a "line
> >> range" filtering for log discussed in
> >> https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2016-October/088687.html.
> >> I would have liked to add tests for this revset but it seems to me that
> >> the current test repositories are not complex enough for this: I'd need
> >> files with significant content and changes in this content. Any idea how
> >> I could do this?
> > Maybe we can share some bits with test-annotate.t ?
> Repositories in these are indeed more complex. So should I append tests
> in this file or reproduce similar repositories in test-revset.t?
I *think* adding tests to test-annotate.t is okay since the behavior of
changes() revset is somewhat similar to annotate.
Jun might have more data sets for his fastannotate extension?
More information about the Mercurial-devel