[PATCH 3 of 8 V2] internals: document compression negotiation
raf at durin42.com
Sat Dec 24 13:47:16 EST 2016
> On Dec 24, 2016, at 1:34 PM, Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc at gmail.com> wrote:
> Where do we stand with this series? I was waiting for feedback, but none arrived.
I believe I had asked that others look at it, and hearing nothing, we should conclude nobody else cares and move on and queue it with whatever little bits I had to say on this v2. Does that work for you?
(I did give you feedback, right?)
> I'd like to get zstd into the wire protocol and revlogs for 4.1, otherwise it isn't very useful (I've been holding off patchbombing the revlog series because I already have enough things in flight). With the holidays, we effectively have 2 weeks before freeze.
> FWIW, getting reviews this cycle has been extremely frustrating to me. I was planning on landing zstd, `hg debugupgraderepo`, `hg display`, and various polish work for more robust zstd integration in the 4.1 release. It's now looking like a good chunk of that work won't make it. The most frustrating part is that most of the code was ready in November :/ I think there needs to be a discussion about scaling code review (no later than the next sprint) because it's been obvious for a few months now that things aren't as well-oiled as they were several months ago.
Also agreed. Note that this one got lost while you were on vacation (or something?), and debugupgraderepo I left for marmoute at his explicit request, but I haven’t seen movement there.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Mercurial-devel