[PATCH RFC] RFC: allow optional C++ 11 extensions with pybind11 for performance code

[Bryan O'Sullivan]

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Laurent Charignon <lcharignon at fb.com> wrote:

> This is a proposal to allow us to write C++ 11 extensions (in addition to
> C89),
> for optional performance code.
>

Can you share an example of a realistic C++-based extension that
demonstrates a significant improvement in readability and safety? It seems
to me that for such a large change, there's a significant burden of proof
that this proposal should meet.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20160209/a4d78b60/attachment.html>