How much is Bitbucket largefiles support worth to you?

Pierre-Yves David pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org
Thu Feb 11 19:15:19 EST 2016



On 02/11/2016 10:58 PM, Sean Farley wrote:
>
> Augie Fackler <raf at durin42.com> writes:
>
>>> On Feb 11, 2016, at 5:51 PM, Augie Fackler <raf at durin42.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Feb 11, 2016, at 5:50 PM, Sean Farley <sean at farley.io> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> On 02/10/2016 07:48 PM, Sean Farley wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Using capability seems a quite good idea indeed. I do not get the issue
>>>>> Sean is trying to point at as I'm not sure I see a significant
>>>>> difference between the capability and pushkey approach.
>>>>
>>>> Are capabilities sent before or after authentication?
>>>
>>> After, which is why pushkey probably makes more sense.
>>
>> Err, that should say before. Listen to what I mean, not what I type.
>>
>> Sigh.
>
> ;-)
>
> If the capabilities are sent before, then pushkey would be the only way
> to send the customized url (with the authentication token) in it.

The capabilities are sent "before" what?


-- 
Pierre-Yves David


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list