[PATCH] hgwatchman: new experimental extension

[Siddharth Agarwal]

On 2/23/16 14:24, Sean Farley wrote:
> I completely fail to see how that will help the user asking those
> questions. Why wouldn't they ask if hgwatchman isn't enough? I don't
> believe keeping a redundant two letters is needed nor will help these
> already confused users.

Because 'hgwatchman' makes it plainly obvious that this is the 
integration layer between hg and watchman, not the watchman tool itself.

(I'm going to bow out of this discussion because I think I've made my 
point.)