[PATCH] hgwatchman: new experimental extension

[Sean Farley]

Siddharth Agarwal <sid at less-broken.com> writes:

> On 2/23/16 14:24, Sean Farley wrote:
>> I completely fail to see how that will help the user asking those
>> questions. Why wouldn't they ask if hgwatchman isn't enough? I don't
>> believe keeping a redundant two letters is needed nor will help these
>> already confused users.
>
> Because 'hgwatchman' makes it plainly obvious that this is the 
> integration layer between hg and watchman, not the watchman tool itself.

You're reading users minds now? Come on, the same argument can be made
the other way.

> (I'm going to bow out of this discussion because I think I've made my 
> point.)

Ok but I fail to be convinced.