[PATCH] hgwatchman: new experimental extension

[timeless]

i favor `watchman` over `hgwatchman`
if watchman (the hgext) can't find the watchman service, it should
tell the user and explain what to do.

would don't have hgpager, or hgbugzilla.

We do have `hgcia` third party, but i claim that if we wanted to
integrate it into core we should rename it to cia too.




On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Sean Farley <sean at farley.io> wrote:
>
> Sean Farley <sean at farley.io> writes:
>
>> Siddharth Agarwal <sid at less-broken.com> writes:
>>
>>> On 2/23/16 14:24, Sean Farley wrote:
>>>> I completely fail to see how that will help the user asking those
>>>> questions. Why wouldn't they ask if hgwatchman isn't enough? I don't
>>>> believe keeping a redundant two letters is needed nor will help these
>>>> already confused users.
>>>
>>> Because 'hgwatchman' makes it plainly obvious that this is the
>>> integration layer between hg and watchman, not the watchman tool itself.
>>
>> You're reading users minds now? Come on, the same argument can be made
>> the other way.
>>
>>> (I'm going to bow out of this discussion because I think I've made my
>>> point.)
>>
>> Ok but I fail to be convinced.
>
> This sounded more absolute than I intended. Sorry about that, trying to
> type three things at once did that for me. What I meant was more of:
>
> I want to be convinced but am currently not. At the end of the day,
> while I do feel strongly about this issue, I realize that I will
> probably be out voted. Not a big deal.
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial-devel mailing list
> Mercurial-devel at mercurial-scm.org
> https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel