another probably Solaris test failure (largefiles)

Augie Fackler raf at durin42.com
Thu Jan 14 13:46:23 CST 2016


On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Danek Duvall <danek.duvall at oracle.com> wrote:
> Matt Mackall wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2015-11-16 at 19:59 -0500, timeless wrote:
>> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Danek Duvall <danek.duvall at oracle.co
>> > m> wrote:
>> > > test-largefiles-update.t
>> >
>> >
>> > For reference, this difference also happens on OS X, it's a
>> > "known-ish" fail. I haven't had time to complain loudly about it.
>>
>> I took a peek at this and I can't see why we move it back. I've cc'd
>> Mads who might have an opinion (since he wrote the test).
>
> Mads hasn't posted anything to this list since later October.  Does anyone
> know if he's okay?

I'd assume so. He's gone dark in the past. Are you still having this
problem on Solaris? If you send a patch to fix, I can try and divine
why things are being done in the test.

>
> Danek
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial-devel mailing list
> Mercurial-devel at selenic.com
> https://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list