[PATCH 3 of 5 V3] templates: add support for summary webcommand in json style

[Yuya Nishihara]

On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 22:44:13 +0800, Anton Shestakov wrote:
> 20.06.2016, 22:34, "Yuya Nishihara" <yuya at tcha.org>:
> > On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 22:20:20 +0800, Anton Shestakov wrote:  
> >>  20.06.2016, 17:25, "Laura Médioni" <laura.medioni at logilab.fr>:  
> >>  > # HG changeset patch
> >>  > # User Laura Médioni <laura.medioni at logilab.fr>
> >>  > # Date 1465218851 -7200
> >>  > # Mon Jun 06 15:14:11 2016 +0200
> >>  > # Node ID ad0ee6b2ebd8a442b308c3148fc18c2235aa7a88
> >>  > # Parent 7e920504e0310edef1f2565ba4cf7edd309c6434
> >>  > templates: add support for summary webcommand in json style  
> >  
> >>  > + {
> >>  > + "archives": [],  
> >>
> >>  Can we have a list of archives in the test here?  
> >
> > I don't think "archives" is useful in JSON output. It says
> >
> >   "archives": [
> >     {
> >       "node": "tip",
> >       "extension": ".tar.gz",
> >       "type": "gz"
> >     }
> >   ]
> >
> > so what?
> >
> > Can we just remove "archives" ?  
> 
> We can, but how about improve instead?
> 
> I'd say having an absolute URL for downloading an archive here would be useful. Probably "extension" can go away. Something like this looks alright:
> 
>    "archives": [
>      {
>        "node": "tip",
>        "url": "https://code.example.com/user/project/archive/tip.tar.gz",
>        "type": "gz"
>      }
>    ]

Yeah, it will provide useful information.

> Not sure how useful "node" is right now... But we could add more things
> there? Maybe branches, tags (or should I say "more tags", because "tip")
> or bookmarks?

Maybe. But "tip" isn't a node, we'd better start without "node".