[PATCH 1 of 6] histedit: move autoverb logic from torule to ruleeditor

Sean Farley sean at farley.io
Wed Jun 29 23:08:59 EDT 2016

Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org> writes:

> On 06/22/2016 01:32 AM, Sean Farley wrote:
>> # HG changeset patch
>> # User Sean Farley <sean at farley.io>
>> # Date 1464306370 25200
>> #      Thu May 26 16:46:10 2016 -0700
>> # Node ID 01212d1f93a2a6c5c736dc0c7d45ffd1930e5c2f
>> # Parent  aa1d56003872cba207d908706da059141dd901a5
>> # EXP-Topic autoverb
>> histedit: move autoverb logic from torule to ruleeditor
> This series is taking me more time to review than it could. It mostly
> come from the fact that the commit description are not very helpful to me.
> The descriptions in this series are extremely factual and descriptive
> about the patch and does not contains much context. In practice, this
> mean than the description mostly duplicate the patch information without
> helping me to understand why the change is the right thing to do.
> For example, on this first changeset, you are moving logic X from class
> A to class B. It would help me to know what is the semantic of class A
> and B and why X fit better in B. Otherwise reviewing this series
> requires me to re-analyze the whole source of histedit in order to
> understand what is going on here. If you could write down the principle
> you used decide how to move forward, it would allow me (and any other
> reader) to first quickly validate the principle and then validate the
> change based on that principle. Because of this, that series have been
> delayed in my "second pass in more depth bucket for a couple of day"
> (because I did not got time to make such second pass yet).
> Consider sending a V2 with more explanation if you want to speedup the
> handling of that series.

Sure, makes sense.

More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list