[PATCH 1 of 3 RFC] import: document --exact behavior in more detail

[timeless]

Ah, right.
On Mar 11, 2016 4:10 PM, "Augie Fackler" <raf at durin42.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 4:03 PM, timeless <timeless at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Augie Fackler <raf at durin42.com> wrote:
> >> + _('abort if patch would apply lossily')),
> >
> > I'm wondering if we could use:
> > abort if hunks of the patch would be lost or corrupted
> >
> > (Sorry, I did try to think of things earlier but didn't come up with any)
>
>
> It's not just hunks though. It could be that the exported changeset
> had a rebase_source in extra which doesn't get encoded in the exported
> change.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20160311/f8c8cb5e/attachment.html>