[PATCH] rebase: persist rebaseskipobsolete state

[Pierre-Yves David]

On 03/21/2016 11:52 AM, Laurent Charignon wrote:
> In theory we could recompute it, and maybe have a different result.

What kind of different result and how would that be problematic?

> I did store the information here because:
> - it is simpler
> - it is what we do for the other values during rebase (so we do the same
> thing)
>
> What's the concern with writing / reading the list?

Changing the format is not great and I would prefer that we don't have 
to do it.

Cheers,

-- 
Pierre-Yves David