The clowncopter have moved
pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org
Mon Mar 21 21:13:18 EDT 2016
On 03/21/2016 06:07 PM, Sean Farley wrote:
> Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org> writes:
>> On 03/21/2016 05:40 PM, Sean Farley wrote:
>>> Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org> writes:
>>>> Good news everyone,
>>>> The "clowncopter" (where all the review not done by Matt) have been
>>>> deprecated and we are now using the "hg-commited" repository.
>>>> The new repository can be found here:
>>> Would it make more sense to name this hg-reviewed? Not a big deal, just wondering.
>> We have a long standing principle that everybody in the community should
>> feel empowered to jump in and start doing some review of anyone else's
>> Changing the name to "reviewers" would give a false sense that only they
>> are expected to review other people's patches. So we picked another name
>> to avoid that.
> Fair enough.
>> While we are at it, I would like to remind all contributors that we need
>> your help and reviews for the patches to flow. It's very valuable when
>> you provide feedback on a patch, say that a patch looks good, or that a
>> new behavior makes sense to you. When you do so, it is doubly effective
>> to go update the state of that patch in patchwork:
>> Create an account, and ask one of the "committers" for access to the
>> Mercurial project. Then move patches to the "Pre-Reviewed" state for
>> them to get attention from "committers" faster.
> I should write some elisp show I don't have to fire up a web browser.
If you write a "patchwork" extensions to interact with this you'll get a
jar of cookies.
More information about the Mercurial-devel