[PATCH] rebase: persist rebaseskipobsolete state

Laurent Charignon lcharignon at fb.com
Thu Mar 24 19:50:35 EDT 2016

Yes, but if we don't change the format, we could have rebase --continue
doing different things depending on what happens between the abort and
I think that we want rebase --continue to show the same things than rebase
would have showed if it hadn't aborted.
That goes against the way we do it for rebase normally and I don't feel
like it is the right choice here.
Does anyone else have an opinion on that?



On 3/21/16, 11:57 AM, "Pierre-Yves David" <pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org>

>On 03/21/2016 11:52 AM, Laurent Charignon wrote:
>> In theory we could recompute it, and maybe have a different result.
>What kind of different result and how would that be problematic?
>> I did store the information here because:
>> - it is simpler
>> - it is what we do for the other values during rebase (so we do the same
>> thing)
>> What's the concern with writing / reading the list?
>Changing the format is not great and I would prefer that we don't have
>to do it.
>Pierre-Yves David

More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list