Maintainer for Website needed

Pierre-Yves David pierre-yves.david at
Thu Mar 31 17:27:32 EDT 2016

On 03/28/2016 09:33 PM, Anton Shestakov wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:35:36 -0700
> Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david at> wrote:
>> On 03/28/2016 10:38 AM, Sean Farley wrote:
>>> Sean Farley <sean at> writes:
>>>> Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david at> writes:
>>>>> On 03/08/2016 10:33 AM, David Soria Parra wrote:
>>>>>> Hey Team,
>>>>>> I am currently still the maintainer of the Mercurial website
>>>>>> found at Last year the
>>>>>> website has been run in very basic maintainence mode because of
>>>>>> my lack of time. However I think the website deserves more time
>>>>>> as it has great potential.
>>>>>> As such I am looking for someone to step up and take over the
>>>>>> website. I am happy to grand admin access on bitbucket or move
>>>>>> the repository somewhere else. I can help out during the move,
>>>>>> but if nobody is found, we have to coninue the current mode.
>>>>> To move forward with this, the website repository is now hosted
>>>>> on the project infrastructure:
>>>> For shits and giggles, I edited the history to close branches
>>>> properly and be a little more clean:
>>> Gentle ping about this. You can pull from this but need to run:
>>> $ hg phase -fd 4224
>> I've no strong opinion about this, I don't really see the state of
>> the old history as a huge problem but now that sean went into the
>> trouble of fixing it, why not ?
>> If other people involved in the website (anton?) would like to jump
>> in and express an opinion. I would be happy to apply whatever is
>> chosen
> I also say why not.
> New repo location suggests that people won't be using pull requests with
> named branches for contributing to it now, so it makes sense to close
> the old feature branches, even just to clean up hg heads output. I
> don't mind if it's done as a history rewrite or as a bunch of separate
> --close-branch commits.

Given an impressive majority of 1 out 1 people that care that are 
interrested in this rewrite, I've applied it. Thanks goes to Sean for 
cleaning this up.

Reclone/rephase/rerere to put your repository back into shape.


Pierre-Yves David

More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list