[PATCH 5 of 5 v4] changegroup3: enable on 'lfs' repo requirements

Pierre-Yves David pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org
Tue Nov 29 01:59:11 EST 2016


[cc martin because I've a question about some code mentioning 'treemanifest'

On 11/23/2016 06:39 PM, Remi Chaintron wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Remi Chaintron <remi at fb.com>
> # Date 1479916365 0
> #      Wed Nov 23 15:52:45 2016 +0000
> # Branch stable
> # Node ID b421c16161aed491fec20b600df5f1278b07bc1a
> # Parent  75ee4746c198f039a39400e855e9335afc34f1dd
> changegroup3: enable on 'lfs' repo requirements
>
> `changegroup3` is required by the `lfs` extension in order to send flags for
> revlog objects over the wire.

It seems like the commit message needs to be updated too.

> diff --git a/mercurial/changegroup.py b/mercurial/changegroup.py
> --- a/mercurial/changegroup.py
> +++ b/mercurial/changegroup.py
> @@ -879,14 +879,16 @@
>  # Changegroup versions that can be applied to the repo
>  def supportedincomingversions(repo):
>      versions = allsupportedversions(repo.ui)
> -    if 'treemanifest' in repo.requirements:
> +    if ('treemanifest' in repo.requirements or
> +        'lfs' in repo.requirements):
>          versions.add('03')

I've not seen 'lfs' used anywhere yet so this changeset seems a bit 
premature. Given the code in this series I would expect the next step to 
be a minimal usage of the new code (either by porting some of censor or 
by using a test extension). Then we can start working on exchanging 
these flagged changesets.

In addition, this piece of code is suspicious. If we have a changelog 
'03' available, we should be using it. I'm not sure why we only consider 
it when treemanifest is used. Martin: is this the remain of a period 
where the '03' format was experimental? Did we actually tested the new 
format now? Can we drop this special case?


>      return versions
>
>  # Changegroup versions that can be created from the repo
>  def supportedoutgoingversions(repo):
>      versions = allsupportedversions(repo.ui)
> -    if 'treemanifest' in repo.requirements:
> +    if ('treemanifest' in repo.requirements or
> +        'lfs' in repo.requirements):
>          # Versions 01 and 02 support only flat manifests and it's just too
>          # expensive to convert between the flat manifest and tree manifest on
>          # the fly. Since tree manifests are hashed differently, all of history
> diff --git a/mercurial/localrepo.py b/mercurial/localrepo.py
> --- a/mercurial/localrepo.py
> +++ b/mercurial/localrepo.py
> @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@
>  class localrepository(object):
>
>      supportedformats = set(('revlogv1', 'generaldelta', 'treemanifest',
> -                            'manifestv2'))
> +                            'manifestv2', 'lfs'))
>      _basesupported = supportedformats | set(('store', 'fncache', 'shared',
>                                               'dotencode'))
>      openerreqs = set(('revlogv1', 'generaldelta', 'treemanifest', 'manifestv2'))
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial-devel mailing list
> Mercurial-devel at mercurial-scm.org
> https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
>

-- 
Pierre-Yves David


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list