[PATCH] help: backout the boolean flag marking in the help for now

[Kevin Bullock]

> On Oct 9, 2016, at 14:33, Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org> wrote:
> 
> On 10/09/2016 02:11 PM, Kevin Bullock wrote:
>>> On Oct 9, 2016, at 14:06, Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> # HG changeset patch
>>> # User Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org>
>>> # Date 1475975478 -7200
>>> #      Sun Oct 09 03:11:18 2016 +0200
>>> # Node ID ae009a7425ca52fdffa451506c0e47ff3750a895
>>> # Parent  dbcef8918bbdd8a64d9f79a37bcfa284a26f3a39
>>> # EXP-Topic flag.bool
>>> help: backout the boolean flag marking in the help for now
>>> 
>> [...]
>>> diff --git a/tests/test-extension.t b/tests/test-extension.t
>>> --- a/tests/test-extension.t
>>> +++ b/tests/test-extension.t
>>> @@ -530,19 +530,19 @@ hide outer repo
>>>      --cwd DIR           change working directory
>>>   -y --noninteractive    do not prompt, automatically pick the first choice for
>>>                          all prompts
>>> -   -q --[no-]quiet        suppress output
>>> -   -v --[no-]verbose      enable additional output
>>> +   -q --quiet             suppress output
>>> +   -v --verbose           enable additional output
>> 
>> Why are these showing up in the backout? I thought the final patch that landed already skipped these flags--is that not true?
> 
> The initial changeset is f3c4edfd35e1 (this fell of the description during the edition :-/) that changeset contains such line. I'm not sure why they end up being there. Does that answer your question ?

That and looking back at <https://selenic.com/hg/rev/e1f0ec0b7d2d> answered my question. It was only --help, --version, and --noninteractive that we banned from having a --no- variant.

> We should probably reintroduce the original hash in the description.

Yep. Queued with that fix.

pacem in terris / мир / शान्ति / ‎‫سَلاَم‬ / 平和
Kevin R. Bullock