[PATCH 4 of 8 v2] commands: stop abusing int-ness of Python booleans
timeless at gmail.com
Thu Sep 1 14:48:35 EDT 2016
Can we change ">1" to ">=2" to make this clearer?
On Aug 31, 2016 5:33 PM, "Augie Fackler" <raf at durin42.com> wrote:
> > On Aug 31, 2016, at 17:19, Kevin Bullock <kbullock+mercurial at ringworld.
> org> wrote:
> >> On Aug 30, 2016, at 15:16, Augie Fackler <raf at durin42.com> wrote:
> >> # HG changeset patch
> >> # User Augie Fackler <augie at google.com>
> >> # Date 1472586452 14400
> >> # Tue Aug 30 15:47:32 2016 -0400
> >> # Node ID c65c0181a9885d3c95e808272c2f609c3a9c8749
> >> # Parent 69d84366fa224f5dedfdd18a9f5e2413060a8121
> >> commands: stop abusing int-ness of Python booleans
> >> This will break as soon as fancyopts starts returning None for all
> >> unspecified boolean flags.
> >> diff --git a/mercurial/commands.py b/mercurial/commands.py
> >> --- a/mercurial/commands.py
> >> +++ b/mercurial/commands.py
> >> @@ -896,7 +896,8 @@ def bisect(ui, repo, rev=None, extra=Non
> >> bad = True
> >> else:
> >> reset = True
> >> - elif extra or good + bad + skip + reset + extend + bool(command) >
> >> + elif extra or sum(1 for b in (good, bad, skip,
> >> + reset, extend, command) if b) > 1:
> > Couldn't we stop abusing math for this at all using any()?
> > elif extra or any((good, bad, skip, reset, extend, command)):
> > Docs say it was added in Python 2.5.
> No, because we care if *more than one* of the bools was true. I originally
> had the same idea though.
> > pacem in terris / мир / शान्ति / سَلاَم / 平和
> > Kevin R. Bullock
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mercurial-devel mailing list
> > Mercurial-devel at mercurial-scm.org
> > https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
> Mercurial-devel mailing list
> Mercurial-devel at mercurial-scm.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Mercurial-devel