[PATCH] help: show content for explicitly disabled extension (issue5228)

Piotr Listkiewicz piotr.listkiewicz at gmail.com
Mon Sep 5 16:32:34 EDT 2016


>
> The change looks good, but this isn't what issue5228 proposes, which says
> complete docstring should be available for unloaded extensions.


I don't understand it, does it deal with unloaded extension that are not
processed in extensions.loadall(not specified in hgrc)? In this case how do
we know where to find those extensions?

2016-09-03 17:49 GMT+02:00 Yuya Nishihara <yuya at tcha.org>:

> On Thu, 01 Sep 2016 22:08:58 +0200, liscju wrote:
> > # HG changeset patch
> > # User liscju <piotr.listkiewicz at gmail.com>
> > # Date 1472760402 -7200
> > #      Thu Sep 01 22:06:42 2016 +0200
> > # Node ID fbf842ccbfcf26f3f110638ba6b174891bb0d69f
> > # Parent  f148bfa40489269be2e48046734f81065129847a
> > help: show content for explicitly disabled extension (issue5228)
>
> The change looks good, but this isn't what issue5228 proposes, which says
> complete docstring should be available for unloaded extensions.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20160905/f520ce37/attachment.html>


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list