[PATCH 3 of 3 v4] help: mark boolean flags with [?] and explain that they can be negated (RFC)

[Yuya Nishihara]

On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 11:15:03 -0400, Augie Fackler wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Augie Fackler <augie at google.com>
> # Date 1473821892 14400
> #      Tue Sep 13 22:58:12 2016 -0400
> # Node ID bc6e18d8c469a1671c2d6725da5771fed3972323
> # Parent  aea18fa52d954e234fdfd1d24d3f37f0cb03dc60
> help: mark boolean flags with [?] and explain that they can be negated (RFC)
> 
> This is an RFC because I'm still not crazy about how this is
> documented - perhaps we should add some text discussing what it means
> for a flag to be a boolean flag and be negatable?

I'm not opposed to this change, but it appears we aren't sure how this should
be documented yet. So I don't take this patch for now.