Internal-changeset concept

Pierre-Yves David pierre-yves.david at
Wed Apr 5 07:28:57 EDT 2017

On 04/04/2017 09:06 PM, Jun Wu wrote:
> Since most people want a separate hidden storage that handles wider cases, I
> don't think this incomplete (internal-only) solution worths investment.

They seems to be misunderstanding here. We should probably jump on a 
Face to Face medium

What I've been trying to point out here is that separating 
internal-changesets from real-changesets has value (and even seems 
necessary to build a good UI). And that phases seems a good choice to 
make "internal" distinction. And I do not see you answering these two 

I understand you want another independent hiding mechanism for 
change-set, This is not incompatible with the current proposal.

As we do not seems to make progress with email, would you be available 
to discuss this over Video Conference?


Pierre-Yves David

More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list