Internal-changeset concept
Pierre-Yves David
pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org
Wed Apr 5 07:28:57 EDT 2017
On 04/04/2017 09:06 PM, Jun Wu wrote:
> Since most people want a separate hidden storage that handles wider cases, I
> don't think this incomplete (internal-only) solution worths investment.
They seems to be misunderstanding here. We should probably jump on a
Face to Face medium
What I've been trying to point out here is that separating
internal-changesets from real-changesets has value (and even seems
necessary to build a good UI). And that phases seems a good choice to
make "internal" distinction. And I do not see you answering these two
points.
I understand you want another independent hiding mechanism for
change-set, This is not incompatible with the current proposal.
As we do not seems to make progress with email, would you be available
to discuss this over Video Conference?
Cheers,
--
Pierre-Yves David
More information about the Mercurial-devel
mailing list