[PATCH 1 of 8] bundle: allow bundle command to use changegroup3 in tests
pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org
Sun Apr 9 12:22:43 EDT 2017
On 04/09/2017 01:42 AM, Augie Fackler wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 05:19:20PM +0200, Pierre-Yves David wrote:
>> On 04/07/2017 04:44 PM, Jun Wu wrote:
>>> Excerpts from Pierre-Yves David's message of 2017-04-07 16:39:03 +0200:
>>>>>> Is there any reasons why we can't just have bundle spec to support cg3?
>>>>> martinvonz reminds me that the treemanifest part is tricky.
>>>> You mean that currently, your cg3 bundle does not support treemanifest?
>>>> If so, I'm not sure this is a blocker since treemanifest are still
>>>> experimental and already unsupported by 'hg bundle'.
>>> afaik, cg3 is also experimental.
>> Okay, so it seems fine to not expose it in bundlespec
>> Out of curiosity, any idea of why it is still experimental?
> I don't think so.
I'm a bit confused from a language perspective.
Are you saying they are no reason for it to stay experimental?
> There are still some performance nasties that I need
> to chase down in narrowhg that *might* turn out to be a treemanifest
> problem, but I think it's far more likely to be a "matchers are slow"
> It's fine with me if we want to remove the experimental label - I
> think greg was interested in this for Mozilla reasons anyway...
More information about the Mercurial-devel