[PATCH STABLE] record: update help message to use operation instead of "record" (issue5432)

[Yuya Nishihara]

On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 09:59:50 +0100, Ryan McElroy wrote:
> On 4/25/17 10:15 PM, Sean Farley wrote:
> > Boris Feld <boris.feld at octobus.net> writes:
> >
> >> # HG changeset patch
> >> # User Boris Feld <boris.feld at octobus.net>
> >> # Date 1493046804 -7200
> >> #      Mon Apr 24 17:13:24 2017 +0200
> >> # Branch stable
> >> # Node ID 208a60229f9bdf04351442c7a2fd66f41b83ea3e
> >> # Parent  0ea1d9a750da142e67690d88644ce4121ed268a1
> >> record: update help message to use operation instead of "record" (issue5432)
> >>
> >> Update the hunk selector help message to use the operation name instead
> >> of using "record" for all operations. Extract the help message in the same way
> >> as other single and multiple message line.
> >> Update tests to make sure that both "revert" and "discard" variants are tested.
> >>
> >> diff -r 0ea1d9a750da -r 208a60229f9b mercurial/patch.py
> >> --- a/mercurial/patch.py	Tue Apr 18 11:10:08 2017 -0700
> >> +++ b/mercurial/patch.py	Mon Apr 24 17:13:24 2017 +0200
> >> @@ -992,6 +992,38 @@
> >>               'record': _("record this change to '%s'?"),
> >>               'revert': _("revert this change to '%s'?"),
> >>           }[operation],
> >> +        'help': {
> >> +            'discard': _('[Ynesfdaq?]'
> >> +                      '$$ &Yes, discard this change'
> >> +                      '$$ &No, skip this change'
> >> +                      '$$ &Edit this change manually'
> >> +                      '$$ &Skip remaining changes to this file'
> >> +                      '$$ Discard remaining changes to this &file'
> >> +                      '$$ &Done, skip remaining changes and files'
> >> +                      '$$ Discard &all changes to all remaining files'
> >> +                      '$$ &Quit, discarding no changes'
> >> +                      '$$ &? (display help)'),
> >> +            'record': _('[Ynesfdaq?]'
> >> +                      '$$ &Yes, record this change'
> >> +                      '$$ &No, skip this change'
> >> +                      '$$ &Edit this change manually'
> >> +                      '$$ &Skip remaining changes to this file'
> >> +                      '$$ Record remaining changes to this &file'
> >> +                      '$$ &Done, skip remaining changes and files'
> >> +                      '$$ Record &all changes to all remaining files'
> >> +                      '$$ &Quit, recording no changes'
> >> +                      '$$ &? (display help)'),
> >> +            'revert': _('[Ynesfdaq?]'
> >> +                      '$$ &Yes, revert this change'
> >> +                      '$$ &No, skip this change'
> >> +                      '$$ &Edit this change manually'
> >> +                      '$$ &Skip remaining changes to this file'
> >> +                      '$$ Revert remaining changes to this &file'
> >> +                      '$$ &Done, skip remaining changes and files'
> >> +                      '$$ Revert &all changes to all remaining files'
> >> +                      '$$ &Quit, reverting no changes'
> >> +                      '$$ &? (display help)')
> > Perhaps as a follow-up (after the freeze) these could be consolidated
> > since they all follow the same pattern? Not a big deal, though.

These messages can't be split nor be boilerplate because of translation.